One liner summary:
Dude dreams of finding treasure, tours the whole world for it and finds out he was sleeping on where the damn thing was buried. <Eye rolls> 👁️👄👁️
Welcome to my blog, where I express my honest thoughts and share candid reviews on books that have left an impression on me. Today, I am eager to present my unfiltered perspective on “The Alchemist” by Paulo Coelho—a book that has gained immense popularity and acclaim, but left me feeling perplexed and underwhelmed. While acknowledging the book’s widespread acclaim, I believe it is equally important to shed light on differing perspectives and offer a critical analysis.
The Alchemist” has garnered a devoted following, captivating readers with its promises of self-discovery, inspiration, and fulfillment. However, as I embarked on this literary journey, I found myself grappling with confusion and questioning the seemingly profound lessons that others have extolled.
While acknowledging that literature is subjective, this review aims to provide a sincere exploration of my own reading experience. Rather than succumbing to the popular narrative, I aim to honestly express my feelings of disconnect and frustration as I traversed the pages of “The Alchemist.”
Throughout this review, I will deconstruct the elements that contributed to my disillusionment, including the book’s heavy reliance on repetitive phrases, the predictability of the plot, and the thinly veiled metaphors that failed to resonate with me on a profound level. I will also explore the contradictions within the book’s overarching philosophy, which left me questioning the practicality of its teachings.
While my perspective may not align with the overwhelmingly positive reception “The Alchemist” has received, I believe it is crucial to embrace diverse opinions and engage in honest discussions about literature. By doing so, we foster a richer understanding of the books we encounter and encourage a more nuanced appreciation for the written word.
Join me as we venture into the heart of my disappointment, as I attempt to reconcile my own experience with the widespread adoration surrounding “The Alchemist.” Through this exploration, we may uncover insights that shed light on both the book’s appeal and its potential limitations. Please note that this review reflects my personal opinions and does not seek to invalidate the experiences and enjoyment others have derived from “The Alchemist.” Instead, it offers a platform for open dialogue and invites readers to critically engage with the book’s merits and drawbacks.
Before I begin this very passionate rant, I want to highlight two crucial points:
1) I HATE self-help books….
And 2) I consider myself a feminist (which means I’m aware of women’s positions in society).
Non-spoilery Part of the review:
From the onset, I felt a sense of detachment from the protagonist, Santiago, and struggled to immerse myself in his supposed transformative quest. The narrative appeared overly simplistic, lacking the depth and complexity that I personally seek in a meaningful literary work.
Let’s delve into the recurring themes found within the book, such as the soul of the world, the language of the world, and the concept of a Personal Legend, which may seem perplexing at first glance. The underlying premise suggests that if one possesses a genuine desire and follows their heart, the entire universe conspires to assist them in achieving their aspirations, provided they remain attentive to omens. 🤷🏻♀️🥲
Regrettably, this book comes across as a poorly executed self-help guide tailored for young children. The writing style is subpar, the narrative is overly didactic, and the messages conveyed are painfully obvious. Having read numerous books, I can confidently assert that this particular work stands out as one of the most over-hyped and disappointing reads I’ve encountered.
Let’s delve into the issue of sexism in this book, as it plays a prominent role in shaping the narrative. It’s intriguing to observe how all the male characters in this story possess a distinct ‘personal legend.’ Whether they are embarking on a quest to discover it, have already accomplished it, or have faced failure, their personal legends remain a focal point. Strangely, the author fails to acknowledge the existence of personal legends for any of the female characters, including Fatima, the love interest of our protagonist, Santiago. Curiously, Fatima is portrayed as an integral part of Santiago’s personal legend, but what about her own personal journey? Why is her fate, as a desert woman, seemingly confined to contentment with mundane chores and gazing at the vast expanse of the desert, patiently awaiting Santiago’s return? (For more details, see page 113, which left me deeply unsettled by the author’s perspective, where even inanimate objects like lead and copper possess personal legends, but women do not.)
The redeeming quality of this book lies in its brevity, offering a concise reading experience (even though it took me nearly two weeks to persevere through the entire text without abandoning it). Furthermore, if Coelho possessed genuine knowledge of alchemy, he might have transformed this subpar material into something remarkable. Unfortunately, it remains stagnant, unable to transcend its initial state of mediocrity.
Contact Us
We’d love to hear from you! Drop us a line below and we’ll do our best to get back to you within one business day.
Keywords: The Alchemist, Paulo Coelho, book review, sexism, personal legend, female characters, gender roles, narrative, self-help, over-hyped, disappointing, alchemy, short book, brevity, transformation.
Hashtags: #TheAlchemist #PauloCoelho #BookReview #SexismInLiterature #PersonalLegend #GenderRoles #SelfHelp #OverHypedBooks #DisappointingRead #Alchemy #ShortBook #Transformation
Drunk in Biblichor 
Leave a comment